Democrats Have No Answers To Bali

If the Democrats actually had reasoned arguments concerning their position -- for example, that what the President has done is worse than what he could have done, more of the American people would take their positions seriously.

As it stands, there is only the vaguest of notions presented by the President's detractors as to how he could have taken a better position on foreign policy issues, which are of the greatest import today.

Indeed, the left's explanation for the President's success in preventing terrorism on American soil -- that terrorists rarely attack twice in quick succession -- was soundly disproved by the events of Bali. And despite proof of this nature that the left is full of nonsense of this kind, the left refuses to learn its lesson and continues to rail on about how bad this President allegedly is. It's simply an appeal to emotionalism without much logic, which is why many inexperienced people, who necessarily must work on instinct because they lack the personal background to apply common sense or reason, tend to buy it.